Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Myrtle East of Washington: The New "Center" of Clinton Hill?

More New Buildings Planned on Myrtle Avenue in Clinton Hill


The lots shown in orange have new buildings either planned, with permits filed, or are currently under construction.
The lots shown in orange have new buildings either planned, with permits filed, or are currently under construction.
Myrtle Avenue in Clinton Hill is seeing quite a number of new buildings proposed for sites that were once parking lots or home to one-story buildings.  As of today, there are five buildings either under construction or with permits filed with city’s Department of Buildings.  All of these private construction projects will be underway at the same time as the city-funded Myrtle Avenue Pedestrian Plaza is under construction, which broke ground this fall.  Below is a summary of where all the new buildings are rising:
Myrtle Car
523-525 Myrtle Avenue
525 Myrtle Avenue: The former site of Myrtle Car (which can now be found just around the corner in the rear storefront of 519 Myrtle Avenue, facing Grand Avenue) will be transformed from a parking lot to a seven-story mixed-use building.  The proposed plans, which have yet to be approved by the DOB, call for a mixed-use building that has 22 residential units, sitting above 2,100 square feet of commercial space.  An additional 500 square feet of community facilities space is also proposed.
533 Myrtle Avenue: As previously reported, this corner site that housed White Castle (which closed its doors on 11/25/2014), will see a five-story mixed use building.  The plans filed back in May 2014 by architect Karl Fischer, called for 6,000 square feet of ground floor retail, with 27 residential units above.  However, a new developer, Greystone & Co., has taken over the project and said that the architect has been replaced, with new building plans not yet submitted.  According to The J Companies, the development’s construction managing firm, demolition will begin shortly after New Year with construction beginning in the spring of 2015.
501 Myrtle
501 Myrtle Avenue, corner of Ryerson Street
501 Myrtle Avenue: This corner property, at Myrtle Avenue and Ryerson Street, is currently home to the one-story Sapolo Restaurant.  Plans filed last week with the DOB call for a five-story addition.  The additional floors will house 11 residential units, with 1,700 square feet of commercial space remaining on the ground floor.  These plans have only been pre-filed with the city and have not yet been approved.
504 Myrtle Avenue: A new building will replace the one-story commercial building that housed the former Pratt Station Post Office, according to building plans filed in late November.  Plans called for a six-story building, with 141 residential units, 115 parking spaces and 20,000 square feet of ground floor retail.  However, according to Madison Realty Capital, the building plans may change and include a larger number of units that could be added through the city’s inclusionary housing bonus which would set aside a portion of the apartments at “affordable” rents.
490 Myrtle Avenue Scaffold
490 Myrtle Avenue, corner of Hall Street.
490 Myrtle AvenueConstruction is almost finished at the topped-out seven-story building on the corner of Myrtle Avenue and Hall Street.  The building will have 93 residential units, with 19,000 square feet of ground floor commercial space.  The ground floor will house the returning Associated Supermarket and a new TD Bank branch.
Myrtle Avenue Pedestrian Plaza: The 25,000 square feet of new pedestrian space on the south side of Myrtle Avenue between Grand Avenue and Emerson Place is under construction.  Click here to read all about this $6 million project and the planned construction schedule.

Newest Renderings of BAM South (286 Ashland Place)

Personally, I love this building and I think it provides much-needed architectural integrity to the burgeoning landscape of ugly, uninteresting glass and steel towers sprouting elsewhere in Ft. Greene and Downtown Brooklyn. I especially admire how the modern Enrique Norten and Ten Architectos-designed building is juxta-positioned next to the classic design of the Williamsburgh Savings Bank Tower (now One Hanson Place Condos), and how the massing of the structure seems intent to obscure the iconic presence of this Brooklyn icon as little as possible.


286 Ashland Place

While the building’s impact on the skyline will be significant, the plans for substantial green, public space and enormous, elevated set-backs permitting pedestrian traffic. Ashland Ave. is very heavily trafficked at the moment with those traveling to or from Barclays or BAM. It will provide a nice, more attractive alternative for them, and one less noisy than for the residents at One Hanson. The first glimpse at the landscaping is also promising, with flowerbeds and grasses not unlike arrangements along The High Line.
286 Ashland Place
(Renderings courtesy of YIMBY)


Monday, December 8, 2014

Brooklyn New Development Report ©

This is the first of quarterly Brooklyn New Development Reports © 2014 my team will publish going forward. The purpose of the Reports is to keep those people interested in new projects in and around "Prime Brooklyn" in the loop regarding new development in the pipeline. Feel free to email me with any questions you have about specific buildings, prices and floor plans as they become available and projected time lines.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

"The Barclays Effect," Creating a New Nightscape for the Surrounding Neighborhood

At 7:30 p.m., on the night of the Nets’ home opener, the TV screens at McMahon’s Public House went dark and then exploded into a bright blue. Staccato drums filled the bar, and to a burst of go-till-you-drop fervor—turn down for what?—the Brooklyn Nets took over the TV screens.
In the bar’s two cavernous rooms, there was not actually much to turn down. At 6:30, McMahon’s had been full of beer-drinking, wing-eating Nets fans. By 7:20, most had paid their tabs and started the block-and-a-half walk down 5th Avenue to the Barclays Center. At 7:40, the bar was empty.
“You going to the game?” the waitress asked the only two patrons left in the place.
This was a Monday, not a night that’s known for carousing. It’s not a problem for McMahon’s that its customers jump ship at game time—what’s most important, said Michael McMahon, the Irish-accented co-owner of the bar, is that these customers come back. According to a transportation survey that Barclays developer Bruce Ratner commissioned several months ago, McMahon’s is just one of what might be called “Barclays bars”—businesses that now live in the shadow of the stadium, some of which opened in the couple of years just before or just after Barclays. And the scenes at those bars, as witnessed on an unscientific basis by Capital, seem to bear out the effect that the Forest City Ratner commission purports to show.arena developer Forest City Ratner commissioned a few months after Barclays opened, on weekdays, 5.4 percent of Barclays’ customers patronized nearby businesses before Nets games; 11.9 percent went out afterward.
A list might include the Montrose and Uncle Barry’s on Fifth Avenue, Mullanes and Mo’s in Ft. Greene, and Woodwork on Vanderbilt Avenue, where Beyoncé once showed up—long enough to take a picture outside, at least. The arena crowd feeds at nearby restaurants, too: Search for “Woodland Brooklyn,” and you’ll find that its defining characteristic, according to Google, is that it’s a “top-rated Brooklyn restaurant near Barclay Center.”
Even if these bars and restaurants don’t define themselves in terms of their relationship to the Barclays Center—many of them strive to be neighborhood joints, with local customers—they’re part of the change that’s crept into this area of Brooklyn in the wake of the arena.
“If you own a restaurant, a bar, a coffee place, anything retail in the hospitality world, you are clearly benefiting from Barclays,” said Carlo Scissura, president of the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce.
He says the chamber has collected internal data that backs up this idea—that some businesses, at least, have benefited from the arena’s presence.
“If you talk to business owners, on nights where there are concerts or games happening, their business is up. Places along Flatbush and 5th Avenue, and the smaller side streets—they are doing very well with Barclays.”
Economists have known for years that stadiums, often proposed as economic game-changers, rarely justify the subsidies their builders extract from political leaders.
“They’re sold as this panacea of economic development—it’s going to revitalize the area, it’s going to be unicorns and rainbows, financially,” said Stephen Buckman, an urban planning post-doc at the University of Michigan who has studied stadium development. “Often, that does not happen.”
Traditionally, the neighborhoods around stadiums suck. On game days, they are filled with streams of bejerseyed fans; on dark days, they are eerily empty of human life.
This isn’t necessarily the fate of all urban arenas, though. Some, even when they are not economic powerhouses, manage at least to avoid being destroyers of neighborhoods.
One of the examples that Buckman has focused on, Denver’s Coors Field, was successful in part, he found, because it incorporated Jane Jacobs’ ideas about what makes city districts work: They must be used for more than one thing and have short blocks, old and new buildings, and a thick concentration of humanity.
When Barclays moved into Brooklyn on a nubbin of land wedged between Park Slope, Ft. Greene and Prospect Heights, the neighborhoods that surrounded it already had these Jacobian features. It was a place that people not only liked to live in but which they felt an allegiance to, and many whose homes were sacrificed to the Barclays vision fought, hard, against leaving.
But space demands in New York can create perversities, like the fact that right now, a thriving neighborhood is not always considered an optimal use of space. Like a smart kid whose parents decide she wasn’t trying hard enough in school, this piece of land, in the eyes of politicians and developers, wasn’t living up to its potential. Close enough to Manhattan, with excellent transportation infrastructure, this was a spot where wealth—and Nets fans—could concentrate.
More than two years after the Barclays Center opened, the neighborhood has undergone a transformation. Before Barclays, more of the shops in the area sold stuff—clothes or furniture or the like. These weren’t the sort of businesses that did well in the Barclays era. On the other hand, the arena employs nearly 2,000 people; approximately 1,600 of them live in Brooklyn, and one-third live in NYCHA developments. The area is still dense and vibrant. There are still old buildings. But in addition to a place where people live, it’s now also place where people go out.
It’s not just Barclays that’s driving this.
“A bunch of places have brought back this whole nightlife scene to Brooklyn, which is very exciting,” said Scissura.
He was thinking of BAM, he said, and Theater for a New Audience.
“It’s that whole downtown Fort Greene entertainment district,” he said.
Academics call this sort of concentration of entertainment a “nightscape”—an industrial district whose product is human pleasure. Its excesses are less toxic than the excesses of the past century’s industry: If you’re choosing, it’s better to have vomit on your street or noise outside your window than a toxic spill in your backyard. (On some blocks of Gowanus, you don’t have to choose.)
As an engine of economic growth, however, arena-driven nightlife might have its limits.
One night, Michael McMahon went into his bar, and it was filled with women. He likes to talk to his customers. These women had come from Long Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, and their children were in the stadium, at a concert. They were staying over in Brooklyn—the moms and their kids both kicking back in the big city, for the night.
This isn’t unusual: While most Nets fans head back to Manhattan or Brooklyn after a game, a good quarter go home to New Jersey, Long Island and the New York and Connecticut suburbs. To some extent, Barclays bars are New Jersey bars and Long Island bars. The places that the bridge-and-tunnel crowds now know as their special spot in the city.
“There are so many supporters for the Nets still from New Jersey,” said McMahon “So many Jersey people come in and support the Nets. Once a Nets fan, always a Nets fan.”
This is an unusual feature of a team relocation. When new stadiums are built to attract teams from far-off cities, there can be some intangible benefit for the residents of the city that snags the team. The Nationals, for instance, brought baseball back to Washington, and Washingtonians duly embraced their new role as Nats fans.
Moving a team from North Jersey to Brooklyn, though, gets into more complicated constructions of regional identity. One of the strange things about New York City is that it’s both a very large city, with a distinct identity and political boundaries, and the core of a much, much larger urban unit that stretches down into Jersey, up into New York State, and into Connecticut. As much as the people who live in this larger city are loath to admit it, places like Hoboken and Jersey City are part of New York City, too; they might be overseen by different politicians, but economically, even culturally, they’re part of New York.
But that connection works more powerfully in one direction: toward the five boroughs. Because it’s easier to get New Jerseyites to root for a Brooklyn team than vice-versa, the Nets’ move has done wonders for the team’s business. Ticket revenue went from 27th in the league to fifth; the team’s merchandise sales jumped from last in the league to near the top—last year, the Nets ranked fourth in jersey sales.
The move has also created new fans: In 2012, with an average of 13,961 fans per home game and total attendance of 460,719, the team came in dead last in the NBA’s attendance report. The next year, the Nets averaged 17,187 fans per game, with 704,702 total attendance, putting them in 16th place, the middle of the pack. (Currently, the team’s holding steady in 17th place; the capacity of Barclays Center means attendance figures could climb only few spots higher, even if every single game sold out.)
These fans now eat and drink in Brooklyn. And while that’s good for the businesses within and immediately around Barclays, it’s not clear that, overall, it counts as economic growth so much as economic shuffling.
“Did people not eat dinner before the Barclays Center?” said Dennis Coates, a University of Maryland-Baltimore County professor who studies sports economics.“Did they not go out to restaurants before the Barclays Center? They did, just not there.”
For those New Jersey fans, for instance, the only change in their allegiance is to where they eat and drink before, during and after the games. New Brooklyn fans were probably just going out to eat and drink somewhere else in Brooklyn.
“You’re attracting business from other places, which is good for you, but it sucks for those other places,” said Coates.
Increasingly, in the case of Barclays, bigger businesses are trying to soak up that spending. International brands, like Uniqlo, and big New York chains, like Shake Shack (which might have started in New York, but hardly counts as a local business any more) are opening up shop within sight of the stadium. Property values in the immediate vicinity—and, with them, rents—are rising, which will make life harder for small, independent outlets.
And as much as Barclays brings business to bars and restaurants in the area, those businesses have to compete with the arena itself, which offers not only food and drink but local, Brooklyn-made food and drink.
“If the eating and drinking happens inside the stadium instead of outside, you’re taking money from moderate income business and giving to wealthy owners,” said Coates, the sports economist. “If you think that’s a good idea, you’re going to be happy with the outcome.”
Forest City Ratner and Barclays have worked to connect the arena’s patrons to the businesses outside. Barclays Center TV points to local shopping; the arena’s app has a list and map of nearby bars and restaurants.
The Nets has hosted viewing parties at nearby businesses (including McMahon’s). There’s a working group that includes local businesses, BIDs, the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce and representatives of the arena and of Forest City Ratner. The working group shares strategies that have worked, like connecting with alumni groups, or providing special deals for Barclays employees.
“Our brand is Brooklyn every day of the week,” says Ashley Cotton, Forest City Ratner’s senior VP for external affairs. “Our long-term investments are tied to the success to Brooklyn. We think the more it’s enhanced, the more we are.”
But Barclays and the businesses it’s boosting are also helping to define what Brooklyn’s brand is. The spot where McMahon’s now operates was previously a run-down divey bar called O’Connor’s that had been there for decades. For some Brooklynites, this was the appeal: “The clientele liked the bar because of its dinginess, not despite it,” L Magazine wrote earlier this year.
But that brand of Brooklyn, apparently, didn’t have enough economic oomph left in it to compete.
Michael McMahon and his partners bought the building with the idea that they wanted to open a bar there.
“We wanted to build a real Irish pub in Brooklyn,” he said—a place with a lot of stone, a lot of wood, Irish whiskeys, corned beef and other Irish fare.
Upstairs, the bar also has a spacious, shiny new event space, which alumni might rent out before their college team plays at Barclays or wedding parties might retire to after a ceremony in Prospect Park.
“We spent a lot of money for the location,” McMahon said. “We could have kept running the bar we had there. But it wasn’t suitable for the clientele that were coming to the stadium.”






This article appeared in the December issue of Capital magazine.

The Real Deal: What to Watch For in Real Estate in 2015

re-20151
After the frenzied sales of 2013, New York City’s real estate market didn’t miss a beat in 2014 — though its pace showed signs of stabilizing, even as prices reached new heights.
Despite the overall market’s widely-described return to “normal,” the co-op market saw its record for the priciest residential sale toppled three times: In September, hedge-fund manager Israel Englander paid $71.3 million for a duplex co-op at 740 Park Avenue, on the heels of the $70 million sale of the late Edgar Bronfman’s penthouse at 960 Fifth Avenue to Egyptian billionaire Nassef Sawiris. They were both outdone less than a month later, when billionaire Leonard Blavatnik dropped $80 million for the unit at 834 Fifth Avenue owned by New York Jets owner Woody Johnson.
It’s no surprise then that there’s more luxury housing coming, as developers race to complete condo towers for the super elite on 57th Street, which has come to be known as “Billionarie’s Row,” while other developments both in Midtown and Downtown reach for the sky, in both price and height.  And there are several mega-developments on the rise, from  Hudson Yards to South Street Seaport to Astoria Cove. But what else can the industry expect in 2015?
In this last issue of the year, The Real Deal takes a look at key topics and trends that will shape the market in the next.
Year of the premiere
 With construction underway citywide, and particularly in neighborhoods like Downtown and the 57th Street corridor, 2015 is poised to see double the amount of new development launches, compared with 2014.
There are 6,287 condos set to launch in 2015, compared with 3,112 in 2014, according to data obtained from Corcoran Sunshine.  
Because of the high cost of land and rising construction prices, the luxury sector is poised to see the lion’s share of the attention, though demand for one- and two-bedroom units is higher than ever. 
“The next step is trying to navigate and deliver something that’s not super luxury,” said Jonathan Miller, president of real estate appraisal firm Miller Samuel. “I think you’ll see more expansion into the lower-upper [end of the market] than what we’ve seen. The demand is extremely high, it’s just hard for the product to be created because of the cost of development.”
In recent months, concerns about a potential glut of inventory at the top of the market have gained more followers. But not everyone agrees.
“I still feel very bullish on the market,” said Susan De França, president and CEO of Douglas Elliman New Development Marketing. Through its partnership with London-based Knight Frank, she said Elliman has its finger on the pulse of the international market. “We still see a real, real strong, deep-rooted demand internationally to purchase in New York City.”
Boutique boom 
Condo developers are bringing a crop of boutique buildings to the market, each crafted with a level of attention and care aimed at drawing discerning buyers.
The trend has already started to take hold. 
Soo Chan's 515 West 29th Street is  one of the boutique condos opening in 2015.

Soo Chan’s 515 West 29th Street is
one of the boutique condos opening
in 2015.
In November, for example, Rome-based Sorgente Group’s 60 White Street launched in Tribeca with eight units, including a 3,078-square-foot penthouse that’s asking $9.265 million. And in September, architecture and development firm Flank launched sales at the six-unit 224 Mulberry Street, selling two condos for upwards of $3,330 per square foot within weeks. A 3,167-square-foot condo asking $10.75 million and a 3,392-square-foot condo asking $11.25 million were put under contract in mid-November.
Then there’s developer Edward Minskoff’s conversion at 37 East 12 Street in Greenwich Village, which launched in November, where the six units are priced from $9 million to $32 million.
According to Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group, 91 properties were set to hit the Manhattan market in 2014, with an average of 37 units each. That compares with 18 properties launched in 2010, with an average of 84 units per property. 
In 2015, several more boutique buildings are set to launch, including Bauhouse Group’s 12-unit building at 515 West 29th Street designed by Soo Chan and an eight-unit building at 559 West 23rd Street that’s being developed by NY8 Properties LLC. 
“I think the new luxury is boutique buildings,” said Douglas Elliman’s Frances Katzen, the exclusive broker for 60 White Street.
Even as smaller buildings proliferate, some developers are coming up with more “efficient” luxury condos — meaning tight-cut units that offer more bang for the buck —such as 15 Leonard. There, four-bedroom units measuring 2,621 square feet went into contract for prices ranging from $6.5 million to $7 million, according to Wendy Maitland, director of sales at Town Residential, which marketed the property. 
The Karl Fischer-designed condos at 432 West 52nd Street also have efficient units, including a 436-square-foot studio for $610,000, or $1,399 per square foot; a 640-square-foot one-bedroom for $995,000, or $1,554 per square foot; and a 1,189-square-foot two-bedroom for $1.6 million, or $1,345 per square foot. 
“It’s important that you have a myriad of product in New York, because there are a myriad of people,” said Elizabeth Ann Stribling-Kivlan, president of luxury brokerage Stribling & Associates.
To be sure, the new development market is still seeing larger residences than are typically available in the resale market. 
During the third quarter, the average size of a resale unit was 2,675 square feet, compared with an average size of 4,364 square feet among new developments. 
“Everything is cyclical. Three to five years ago, there was a dearth of grand-proportioned product,” said Maitland. “Now that the market is being much better served, there’s a tremendous opportunity in building more efficiently.”
And then there are bespoke residences. 
45 East 22nd Street

45 East 22nd Street
At Bruce Eichner’s and Continuum Company’s 45 East 22nd Street, for instance, would-be buyers of the 83 condo units can choose from three wood finishes for the kitchen flooring and cabinetry. 
“Choice in the past has been a complete no-no,” said Leonard Steinberg, president of tech-focused brokerage Urban Compass. “People like the idea of having their own personal choices.”
Others see the market leaning toward “beautiful structures with really functional layouts,” said Stephen Kliegerman, president of Halstead Property Development Marketing.
“I see a more competitive market in the $10 million and up” category, said Town’s Maitland. “There’s going to be a lot of attention paid to the architecture and design and the quality, more than ever.” 
Price pop?
The average sale price in Manhattan for all kinds of residential properties jumped 18 percent from last year during the third quarter, to $1.68 million. Price appreciation in the luxury market was even steeper: The average sale price in the that segment increased 34 percent, to $7.25 million during the third quarter, according to data from Miller Samuel. 
Diane Ramirez, president of Halstead Property, said at a recent REBNY luncheon that the 18 percent increase was “hard for buyers to absorb.Whether price appreciation will continue at the same clip is a source of debate. 
“Right now, we’re at a point in pricing where it’s going to level off,” she said. “New development condo prices have risen 60 percent in the last two years. You can’t sustain those kind of price increases without leveling off.”
Beyond sticker shock, others noted that increased inventory levels have prompted the market to stabilize. “Now that developers, as well as brokers and customers alike, see there’s more in the pipeline, I believe there’s less of a fervor of price appreciation,” said Elliman’s De França.
During the third quarter, the listing inventory in Manhattan jumped 27.6 percent year over year to 5,828, according to Miller Samuel. Meanwhile, the number of sales dropped 13.3 percent to 3,328.
Miller said he thinks prices will continue to rise — a function of fewer sales than the frenzy of 2013 and still-low inventory levels. “We’re going to see some continued rise in inventory, but still far short of equilibrium,” he said. “There’s just been very little new product to date that has been outside of the high-end market.”
Maitland said she expects prices in the luxury market to continue their upward trajectory, because “there’s a larger demographic of buyers who are looking in that range and spending in that range than ever before.” (The “luxury” market is generally defined as the top 10 percent of the market in terms of price.) 
Kathy Braddock, managing director of brokerage William Raveis NYC, noted that buyers from Russia, China and Brazil are still looking to move their money out of those countries. Among those buyers, there’s a continued appetite for trophy apartments. “There’s an underlying reason why these trophy apartments will sell,” she said. Investors “are trying to diversify their assets because of the global picture.” 
Interest rate increase 
Interest rates are still at record lows, but it’s widely believed a rate increase is coming in 2015. And while Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen hasn’t indicated when, economists point to sometime in mid-June. 
That prediction means the next six months are likely to be busy. 
“People are doing deals now as opposed to six months from now, because there’s more certainty,” said Jay Neveloff, a partner at the law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel. “No one has a crystal ball,” he said, but everyone realizes rates are at record lows.
Among residential buyers, De França said an interest rate change would mainly impact first-time buyers, rather than the luxury market. That’s because in New York City, many luxury sales are all-cash, or a significant amount of cash. 
Many of those all-cash sales involve foreign investors, who are expected to continue parking their money in New York real estate.
“The financial-crisis hangover is still with us,” said Miller. “Investors are wary of financial market investing. They’ve shifted to hard assets.” 
He said investors snapping up New York City real estate aren’t necessarily looking to make money. “The primary goal is safety, capital preservation. We’re building the world’s most expensive bank safety deposit box. That’s what some of these buildings will end up being.”
Another group that would likely be hard-hit by rate hikes are developers themselves. 
“It’s going to scare some [developers] away, because of the amount of equity that needs to go into these deals,” said Richard Wood, president and CEO of Plaza Construction. He said higher interest rates would prompt developers to set tighter schedules for contractors, in order to maintain profitability. “Developers or investors are now going to have a lot more risk of losing their investment, because a higher interest rate could suck the profitability out of a job if it’s not kept on schedule.” 
While rising interest rates won’t impact the super high-end buyers or foreign investment, they are likely to slow mid-range condo sales, Wood said. “If something trips the market — maybe interest rates — developers will be holding the bag on a huge equity slug that could end up being lost, or they will have to try to wait it out.” 
Astoria Cove is one of the developments where Mayor Bill de Blasio has marked a victory in his efforts to expand affordable housing in NYC.

Astoria Cove is one of the developments where Mayor Bill de Blasio has marked a victory in his efforts to expand affordable housing in NYC.
Affordable housing
Mayor Bill de Blasio took office in 2014 promising to address New York City’s lack of affordable housing. While details are still sketchy, 2015 could see some of the administration’s proposals implemented, in an attempt to move toward its stated goal of creating or preserving 200,000 affordable units in the next decade. 
The mayor has had a few victories so far, including an agreement with Two Trees Development to increase the number of affordable units at the Domino Sugar factory site in Brooklyn, to 700 out of 2,300 units overall. In November, the city claimed another victory related to the 1,700-unit Astoria Cove project after reaching a deal with developer Alma Realty to make 27 percent of the units affordable. 
To date, the mayor’s office has floated several concepts to ramp up the affordable housing agenda, including new mandatory inclusionary policies in new development and a possible expansion of the existing mansion tax, a 1 percent tax on sales over $1 million that generated $259 million in fiscal 2013. If 0.5 percent was added to transactions over $5 million, the tax would generate another $34 million in 2015 that could be directed to affordable housing. 
Air rights may be in play to boost affordable housing, as well, after the Economic Development Corporation issued a request for proposals that offers free development rights on three city-owned lots in Long Island City, in exchange for permanently affordable housing. 
“I think the city will continue to use every opportunity to support and expand affordable housing,” Neveloff said. “The mayor has made it clear it’s a priority in his administration [and] in their dealings, they are making that clear to the market.” Developers are factoring it in, he said. “It’s the new reality.”
Winston Fisher, a principal at Fisher Brothers, said that like every other operator and developer, his family’s company is watching to see what affordable housing policies take root. “You want affordable housing, and you want something that’s thoughtful and reasonable that doesn’t stifle growth, doesn’t stifle the market. The ripple effect can be profound.” 
Will it be Queens’ turn? 
As developers pushed farther into Brooklyn over the past decade, Queens has similarly seen some development in Long Island City and Astoria. But large swaths of the borough remain untapped. 
At least until now. Some in the industry think Queens will grab the spotlight in 2015.
Even white-glove Manhattan brokerage firms are taking note.
 “There’s only so far you can go into Brooklyn. I think Queens is next,” said Stribling-Kivlan of Stribling & Associates. “You want the best Chinese food in New York? Get out to Flushing. There are some really cool neighborhoods, not just Long Island City and Astoria.” 
Increasingly, Kivlan said, she has buyers asking for Queens. “Queens is an incredibly established borough, but I think we’re going to start seeing some new stuff come out there,” she said, particularly since the commute to Midtown from some areas is just 15 minutes. “Queens reminds me of Manhattan 25 or 30 years ago, where you see an incredible amount of diversity and you get a lot of space out there,” she said. 
To be sure, Queens’ development historically has been a step behind Brooklyn.
“It’s always been ‘Queens next,’” said Fisher, who noted the waterfront has seen a huge amount of development. “Is there organized development that can occur inland from that?” he pondered. “Good question.”
Braddock, meanwhile, described a “seismic shift” in where buyers are searching for homes. “Their first choice is not the island of Manhattan.”
She said by shifting to the outer boroughs, average New Yorkers are able to find more affordable housing.
In fact, high prices in Manhattan are already spurring more rental developments in the “outer outer boroughs,” according to a report from marketing firm Nancy Packes Inc.
For example, Brooklyn has roughly 21,500 rental units in the development pipeline, including 13,025 units in neighborhoods outside the “core” areas of Brooklyn Heights, Downtown Brooklyn, Williamsburg and Dumbo.
In Queens, there are 11,980 units in the pipeline in “core” neighborhoods, which include Hunters Point, Long Island City and Astoria, plus another 3,281 units in the pipeline in other communities in the borough
Brokerage scene 
Following a year that saw top brokers Leonard Steinberg and Kyle Blackmon join startup firm Urban Compass, 2015 is poised to see even more fallout among firms as new companies join the fray.
According to Braddock, buyers check StreetEasy before logging onto any of the firms’ websites. In 2014, industry veterans Braddock and Paul Purcell launched a New York City office for Connecticut-based brokerage William Raveis. “The landscape looks different,” Braddock said. “I think that companies like ours and all the others are making the brokers in more of the established firms look at themselves and say, ‘Gee, could I be doing my business differently?’”
“The biggest mousetrap is StreetEasy. You can be your own broker today, and have the same power, to some extent, that a Corcoran or Douglas Elliman has.”
Consolidation among brokerage houses also has changed the landscape, she noted. Publicly-traded Realogy owns Corcoran Group, Citi Habitats and Sotheby’s International, while Vector Group owns Douglas Elliman, and Terra Holdings is the parent company of Brown Harris Stevens and Halstead Property.
At public companies, Braddock noted, “You have to make a profit. People expect to see certain things. As a private company, you have more flexibility.”
Julia Hoagland, an agent who joined Urban Compass from Brown Harris Stevens in November, said her decision was shaped by a desire to help build a new kind of brokerage. “I really believe in the vision that Urban Compass has, and that they’re going to change the way New York City real estate works by leveraging technology,” she said.
REBNY’s executive search
Although Steven Spinola, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, doesn’t plan to step down until the end of 2015, the search is on for his successor, who will be named in the next few months.
REBNY president Steven Spinola

REBNY president Steven Spinola
Spinola’s intention to retire from REBNY’s top post, a job he’s held since 1986, was first disclosed in June. A search committee led by REBNY Chairman Rob Speyer is leading the charge to find a replacement — no small feat considering Spinola’s name has been synonymous with REBNY’s for nearly three decades. The real estate industry is also facing a particularly uncertain political climate, given that the de Blasio administration is perceived by some as less business- and developer-friendly than the Bloomberg administration was.
The trade group is one of the state’s biggest lobbying groups and Spinola’s successor is likely to be someone skilled at working with city officials and simultaneously representing the interests of the real estate sector.
This fall, several names were floated as potential candidates for the post, including John Banks, vice president of government relations at Consolidated Edison, who is reportedly the front-runner for the job. “We will make an announcement when the search process has concluded,” REBNY spokesman Jamie McShane said in a statement. 
Other contenders are Jim Whelan, senior vice president of public affairs at REBNY who has helped lead REBNY’s lobbying efforts for the past four years, and Ramon Martinez, deputy chief of staff for Melissa Mark-Viverito, City Council speaker.

Monday, December 1, 2014

Up, Down and Sideways? New Elevator Design We Will No Doubt See in High-End Luxury Developments in the Not Too Distant Future

Amazing Interior Photos of a 19th Century Brownstone on Clinton Ave. in Clinton Hill

FROM HYPERALLERGIC.COM http://hyperallergic.com/165364/19th-century-photos-of-a-brooklyn-brownstone/"> BEFORE:
AFTER:

Times Architecture Critic Believes One World Trade Was a Failed Opportunity

Monday, December 1, 2014, by Zoe Rosenberg More than the Twin Towers before it, 1 World Trade Center has become a symbol for New York City, both of its past and its future. While masses of spectators still flock to the site endowed with memory and hope, New York Times architecture critic Michael Kimmelman argues, in his new review of One World Trade Center, that the building fails New Yorkers, perhaps not as a symbol but as a response to the neighborhood's and city's changing ambitions. Instead, for Kimmelman, the building gets hung up on its own smoke-and-mirrors antics. Now, the thrust of Kimmelman's argument in 10 quotes: 1) "1 World Trade speaks volumes about political opportunism, outmoded thinking and upside-down urban priorities ... Even a tower with an outsize claim on the civic soul needs to be more than tall and shiny." 2) "I find myself picturing General MacArthur in aviator sunglasses when I see the building. Its mirrored exterior is opaque, shellacked, monomaniacal." 3) "It abruptly stops at 1,368 feet, the height of the former twin towers, achieving its symbolic target number—1,776 feet—by virtue of a skinny antenna. Counting the antenna is like counting relish at a hot dog eating contest." 4) "Replacing the twin towers with another giant office building was somehow supposed to show New York's indomitable spirit ... To the contrary, 1 World Trade implies (wrongly) a metropolis bereft of fresh ideas. It looks as if it could be anywhere, which New York isn't." 5) "There had been talk after Sept. 11 about the World Trade Center development's including housing, culture and retail, capitalizing on urban trends and the growing desire for a truer neighborhood ... But the idea was brushed aside by the political ambitions of former Gov. George E. Pataki of New York, a Republican, and the commercial interests of Larry Silverstein, the developer with a controlling stake at the site..." 6) "Instead, the building, built as if on a dare to be the tallest, required unprecedented fortifications at astronomical costs, on an immensely difficult site." 7) "The building didn't end up exactly as the architect pictured it. Few buildings do. I'm not sure that the differences are what tipped the scale." 8) "One World Trade is symmetrical to a fault, stunted at its peak, its heavy corners the opposite of immaterial. There's no mystery, no unraveling of light, no metamorphosis over time, nothing to hold your gaze." 9) "With its hotel, offices, restaurants, apartments and observation deck, it is also an all-in-one mixed-use development, built on a busy transit hub. The point is that something better was possible in Lower Manhattan." 10) "...1 World Trade is a cautionary tale. The public had a big stake in making it great. That stake wasn't leveraged." It shouldn't be a total surprise that Kimmelman is down on 1 World Trade Center. Readers got a glimpse into his thinking toward the building's surrounding public plaza in late May when he reviewed the then newly-unveiled 9/11 Memorial, pointing out the space's inability to reconcile the interests of real estate developers, the victims' families, and everyone else. Of course Kimmelman's views are controversial. A tipster writes, "I am not overly receptive of most buildings (insert Frank Gehry gesture) but 1 World Trade is an exceptional design victory over inevitable failure." The comments section on the original Times post is a hotbed of contention. Commenter mj writes, "It's a perfect symbol of who we've become. An expensive inelegant fist, blotting the skyline, completely ignorant of anything surrounding it and taking nothing into account of the humans that are meant to inhabit it." To the contrary, commenter barbara8101 writes, "So you architects and critics can fuss all you like. You can point out what you think are its design deficiencies. You can tell us what you would have preferred. You can show off your knowledge of corners and light and everything else about urban planning, and tell everyone how stupid they were in 'allowing' this building to be constructed. But here is one former New Yorker who still identifies herself as such who loves the building and what it stands for." Although 1 World Trade Center does not have people singing in unified praise, it is, one hopes, here to stay.